Langsung ke konten utama

Bitcoin User Alleges Hack Linked to Erroneous 83.65 BTC Fee Incident

Bitcoin User Alleges Hack Linked to Erroneous 83.65 BTC Fee Incident

The crypto community was initially baffled by the massive fee of 83.65 BTC, originally attributed to a costly mistake. However, recent revelations paint a darker picture. According to a social media account on X called “@83_5BTC,” hackers stole the funds from the unnamed individual and immediately swept the bitcoin to a different wallet.

Alleged Hacking Incident Tied to Bitcoin’s Massive 83.65 BTC Fee Error

The alleged victim, @83_5BTC, revealed that after transferring 139 BTC to a new cold wallet, the funds were immediately swept to another wallet by the attackers. The transaction split the sum, sending 55.77 BTC to the hackers’ wallet, while the rest, a staggering 83.65 BTC, was paid as a transaction fee. This incident surpasses the previous high-fee record of 19.8 BTC.

Mononaut, the anonymous operator behind the mempool.space bitcoin explorer, weighed in on the incident. He suggested that “the most likely explanation is that the wallet was generated from bad entropy.” In layman’s terms, this means the wallet’s security was compromised due to weak randomization in its creation process. Mononaut’s insight provides a crucial understanding of the technical flaw that may have led to this unfortunate event.

Further complicating the issue is the method used for escalating the transaction’s priority, known as “replace-by-fee” (RBF). Mononaut speculates that if the wallet had low entropy, it might have been targeted by multiple attackers, each trying to outmaneuver the other. This competition could explain the unusually high transaction fee, as attackers might use high fees to prevent others from replacing their transactions.

@83_5BTC attempted to prove ownership of the affected wallet by sharing a signed message on social media. Mononaut verified the message but cautioned that since the wallet was compromised, it’s uncertain who actually signed the message — the victim or the hacker. This uncertainty further complicates the situation, especially regarding the potential return of the fees by Antpool.

As the crypto community grapples with this incident, the focus shifts to wallet security and the importance of proper entropy in wallet creation. Mononaut’s advice is clear: “Let this be a reminder not to take shortcuts with your entropy, and ideally to use multisig for very large sums.” This incident serves as a stark reminder of the risks tied to crypto ownership and the crucial need for heightened security measures.

What do you think about the alleged hack and the massive fee that was paid? Share your thoughts and opinions about this subject in the comments section below.



source https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-user-alleges-hack-linked-to-erroneous-83-65-btc-fee-incident/

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Kucoin Hacked for $150 Million in Bitcoin; Bitfinex and Tether Freeze $33 Million of the Stolen Funds

Cryptocurrency exchange Kucoin may have been hacked for $150 million in bitcoin and multiple ERC20 tokens. The Singapore-based exchange confirmed the September 25 security breach, but did not disclose the amount stolen. “Bitcoin, ERC-20 and, other tokens in Kucoin’s hot wallets were transferred out of the exchange,” said Kucoin in an update on Saturday. Meanwhile, Bitfinex and Tether, issuers of the centralized stablecoin USDT , immediately froze a combined $33 million worth of USDT suspected to be part of the funds looted in the Kucoin hack – an action that has stirred questions around the influence of centralized platforms. Paolo Ardoino, chief technology officer of both entities, tweeted that Bitfinex froze $13 million USDT on EOS as part of the hack. Tether froze $20 million USDT “sitting on this ethereum address as a precautionary measure,” he said. In its update, Kucoin maintains that funds in its cold wallets (offline storage, which is less susceptible to hacks) ar...

Binance Blasts CFTC for Trying to Be World’s Derivatives Police, Seeks to Dismiss Lawsuit

Binance has submitted a new motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) against it. The leading cryptocurrency exchange urges the court to reject the agency’s attempt to expand its territorial reach beyond the United States. Binance Accuses CFTC of Using U.S. Lawsuit as a ‘Trojan Horse’ to Gain Global Regulatory Reach The world’s largest digital assets exchange, Binance, has again tried to convince a U.S. court to dismiss the lawsuit in which America’s derivatives markets regulator alleged earlier this year that the crypto company had violated U.S. trading and derivatives rules. The CFTC sued Binance and its CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) in March, claiming that at least since July 2019, the exchange had offered and executed commodity derivatives transactions on behalf of U.S. persons. Binance sought to dismiss the complaint in July which the Commission disputed in September. In its latest filing , the crypto giant argues that the regulat...

Pi Network: Menambang Cryptocurrency Gratis dan Anti Monopoli

Pi Network - Mulai Menambang Gratis Pi Network: Menambang Cryptocurrency Gratis dan Anti Monopoli Pi Network adalah proyek cryptocurrency yang memungkinkan Anda menambang Pi Coin secara gratis dan tanpa perangkat keras canggih. Hanya dengan menggunakan ponsel Anda, Anda bisa bergabung dalam jaringan blockchain yang sedang berkembang ini. Potensi Pi Network: Dengan semakin banyaknya pengguna, Pi Coin bisa menjadi mata uang digital yang sangat berharga di masa depan. Menambang Anti Monopoli: Tidak seperti penambangan tradisional, Pi Network memungkinkan siapa saja untuk berpartisipasi tanpa memerlukan perangkat keras mahal. Cara Menambang: Cukup unduh aplikasi Pi Network, daftar, dan mulai menambang hanya dengan menekan tombol di aplikasi setiap hari. Mulai Menambang Pi Network Gratis